Tag: Clergy sex abuse

  • Sartain and the monumental log in his eye … investigating the LCWR?

    When Vatican officials selected a bishop to head the effort to go after the American nuns of the LCWR and accuse them of wrongdoing, you might guess they’d be very careful to pick a prelate who is clearly beyond reproach.

    Guess again. The church hierarchy – taking the suggestion, some insiders say, of disgraced Cardinal Bernard Law – tapped Seattle Archbishop Peter Sartain to head up the “investigation” into the largest group representing Catholic sisters, the Leadership Council of Women Religious (LCWR).

    But it’s Sartain, not the nuns, who should be investigated.

    Let’s focus on two clergy sex abuse and cover-up cases Sartain handled back when he was the bishop of Joliet Diocese. But before you assume I’m digging up ancient history, please notice that each of these cases took place within the last three years (long after America’s bishops pledged they’d have “zero tolerance” for clergy sex offenders and “openness and transparency” in clergy sex cases).

    Case #1

    In the spring of 2009, a Joliet diocesan seminarian named Alejandro Flores was caught with porn, prosecutors say. (According to one news account, “Though the website posted a disclaimer saying the people involved in the sex acts were not minors, a prosecutor said Catholic officials were concerned some of the images appeared to be those of young boys.”)

    Months later, in June of 2009, Sartain ordained Flores anyway.

    And six months after, in January 2010, Flores was arraigned on charges of molesting a boy twice earlier that month.

    In September 2010, Flores pled guilty.

    And that same month, Pope Benedict promoted Sartain to head Seattle’s archdiocese.

    Keep in mind, by the way, that it’s pretty clear that Bishop Sartain knew of Flores’ misdeeds before Flores was ordained. Joliet is a relatively small diocese and no one has suggested that Sartain’s underlings concealed Flores’ misdeeds from him.

    Case #2

    The same month that Flores was arraigned, a brave man reported to Bishop Sartain’s staff that he had been molested as a child by two Joliet area priests. Both of the clerics – Fr. Lee Ryan and Fr. Kevin McBrien – were still in ministry.

    Five months later, however, neither Sartain nor his staff had taken any action about either priest. The worried and frustrated victim contacted SNAP. At a sidewalk news conference, SNAP disclosed the allegations. Finally, the child molesting clerics were temporarily suspended.

    Many months later, a Joliet chancery office staffer eventually told the victim – privately – that his abuse report was deemed “credible” and that one of the priests would never be restored to ministry. But even then, Sartain chose secrecy, refusing to disclose the finding or his decision publicly, leaving parishioners in the dark about whether or not this priest is a pedophile.

    And he’s maintained that secrecy to this day. Ask a friend or relative of Fr. Ryan or Fr. McBrien about the status of the church “investigation” into child sex abuse allegations against either of them, and you’ll almost certainly be told that there’s been no resolution.

    So in 2010, Sartain kept kids at risk for at least five months by keeping silent about child sex allegations against them. He’s kept kids at risk even since by his continued silence.

    In sum, Sartain has done a terrible job on abuse and cover up in Joliet. He was promoted nonetheless, showing again, that bishops who ignore or conceal child sex crimes keep getting rewarded, not punished. And now he’s been rewarded again – with a high profile role leading an extensive Vatican-sponsored probe into whether US nuns are overemphasizing poverty-fighting work or picking a few controversial conference speakers.

    I think Bishop Sartain needs to remove the monumental log in his own eye before he has any moral authority to investigate the women who have lived the biblical teachings of Jesus.  It makes me wonder if Sartain goes to sleep every night saying the “Prayer of the Pharisee,” (Luke 18-11). If you don’t know it:

    The Pharisee stood by himself and prayed: ‘God, I thank you that I am not like other people—robbers, evildoers, adulterers—or even like this tax collector.

    Yeah, those “other people.” Like nuns and sex abuse victims.

  • A Recipe for Child Protection: Add One Part Hero

    No one—I repeat: NO ONE— wants to get in front of television cameras and say that they were sexually abused. But when someone does, and does it in an eloquent, emotional and powerful way, that person changes the world.

    Case in point: Jessica Bohman

    Jessica Prater Bohman, age 6 five


    According to Bohman, her family members, and a lawsuit she just filed in Kern County Superior Court, Jessica was sexually abused by Foursquare Church youth minister Damon Young from when she was approximately 4 until she was 8 years old.  Damon was 14.

    But his young age didn’t stop Damon from admitting to abusing her and other girls at the church. (I hope to post a copy of the police report soon.) According to the lawsuit, he’d brazenly take Jessica out of church day care and molest her while her parents were at church services, even though, according to the lawsuit, Foursquare church officials knew he was acting inappropriately around the young girls. When I saw “inappropriate,” I mean that he would rub his crotch against little girls when adults were around. This is bad stuff. There is no question that the Young should have been immediately pulled out of youth ministry, the police called and the kids helped. But no one picked up the phone to report their suspicions.

    When Jessica had a sex ed class in junior high, she suddenly realized that what happened to her was very, very wrong.

    Jessica and her family came forward and told church officials that Damon had done things far more heinous to the girl than “crotch rubbing.” What did Foursquare do? Buried it and silenced Jessica. Foursquare officials didn’t report (as required by law) and conned the family into thinking that the right thing to do would be to put the girl in church counseling. Foursquare didn’t report Young after he admitted that he abused Jessica and other girls. The Foursquare church STILL hasn’t reported. Instead, just let him keep working with kids, and manipulated the Prater family into thinking that the church was doing everything properly.

    We’ve seen this before. Why? People want to believe that the leaders of the church where they worship God, baptize their children, marry their spouses, bless the dying, feed the poor and bury the dead are doing the right thing. We delude ourselves when we superimpose God-like morality to humans. (Just look at the recent, non-sex-abuse news out of the Catholic church for the latest in “delusions of morality.”) No one wants to think that their beloved priest, minister, deacon, reverend or bishop is the kind of person loves and protects child molesters over kids. It’s the classic “What would Jesus do?” moment in Bizzaro World.

    But Jessica did something that very few victims do. She came forward, used her name, and spoke publicly about the abuse. Her reasoning: there are other victims out there who CAN put Young behind bars. She wants them to know that it is safe and RIGHT to come forward. I can’t recall the last time I have seen such elegance and eloquence from a victim who is—at 29—still so young.

    Want to continue the discussion? Comment below or follow #FoursquareChurch

     

  • Do I detect a disconnect?

    From today’s Stockton Record:

    From left, Bishop Stephen Blaire, consultant Michael Heenan and Monsignor Richard J. Ryan walk down a hallway inside the San Joaquin County Courthouse on Tuesday morning, when jurors in Michael Kelly’s trial were sent home for the day. (emphasis mine)

    Consultant?

    As a PR person myself, I don’t fault Heenan for doing his job. But trial watchers say that he has been in court every day. That gets pretty spendy. Especially at an hourly rate.

    Between lawyers’ and public relations consultants’ fees to cover the tracks of Fr. Michael Kelly, the priest found liable for abuse—and who then absconded from the country—the Stockton diocese should also be held to account for misleading parishioners about how their hard-earned contributions are spent.

    SNAP volunteers came to support the victim at the trial because it’s the right and good thing to do. But from the treatment they’ve received in the comments of various press stories, and the hammering they are getting from the Bishops, one would think THEY were paying for the high-priced consultants.

    Yeah, that’s a disconnect.

     

     


  • Most of the time – but not every time – our courts get it right …

     

    I am a huge fan of the US justice system.  After more than 200 years, our impartial courts have “gotten it right” a vast majority of the time. It’s not perfect, but it’s the best in the world.

    Here’s a great example:

    Last week, a jury unanimously found that Fr. Michael Kelly was liable for abusing a boy in the 1980s. The trial is currently in its second phase to determine whether or not the Diocese of Stockton knew about the abuse and covered it up.  It took the alleged victim years to get the case in front of a jury, and 12 impartial citizens made their decisions based on the evidence. (One of Kelly’s supporters has been accused of jury tampering. Let’s hope that if true, that person is punished to the fullest extent of the law).

    And another:

    A Missouri judge has refused to drop misdemeanor criminal charges against Kansas City- St. Joseph Bishop Robert Finn and the Diocese. The charges stem from allegations that Finn knew that one of his priests possessed child pornography. Instead of reporting to law enforcement (possession of child pornography is a federal crime, remember?), Finn allegedly sat on the information, sent the priest out of state (?!), and didn’t warn local families that their kids may have been victims of abuse. The priest who took and kept the photos has been indicted on 13 counts of exploiting five children ages 2 to 13.

    But sometimes, judges get it wrong:

    A bankruptcy judge in Milwaukee has refused to make public secret church documents and depositions that outline the scope and scale of child sex abuse and cover-up in the Archdiocese of Milwaukee. The documents were produced when the Archdiocese of Milwaukee sought bankruptcy protection to avoid potentially embarrassing public civil trials.

    Judge Susan V. Kelley’s reasoning? They were “too scandalous.”

    Note to Judge : Civil law exists to punish wrongs, compensate victims for injury and DETER FURTHER WRONGDOING. The only way to truly punish the Archdiocese and deter further wrongdoing is to expose the full scope and scale of the abuse.  If we don’t know what church officials knew and did, how can we be sure that they won’t turn around and do it again?

    This bankruptcy has nothing to do with finances. Instead, it has everything to do with silencing victims and denying them their days in court.

    Yes, scandal is ugly. No one likes to learn that hundreds of kids were abused and that priests and bishops knew about the crimes and did nothing to help kids. But shining a public light on secret church files will serve every community where a predator worked. The documents will also help law enforcement who, in places like Delaware and California, used these kinds of documents to put child molesters behind bars.

  • Breaking News: Jury says Fr. Michael Kelly Abused Victim

    The jury came in with a unanimous verdict for Michael Kelly’s victim. If a jury can determine that in less than two hours, why did the Diocese of Stockton allow him to keep working with kids? For years?