Category: Child safety

  • Talking to Tamron Hall about the Jared Fogle scandal

    I am interviewed via phone (Skype was not cooperating). We discuss Jared Fogle’s plea in child porn/child sex trafficking (underage prostitute) charges.

    I come in at around 8:30.

  • Want to learn about crime victims’ rights?

    Next month, Anaheim is hosting one of the best national training institutes on crime victims’ rights.

    I’ll be presenting—and if you are going to be in Southern California in early September, this is a must-attend event.

    The National Center for Victims of Crime’s 2015 National Training Institute features more than 130 leading experts and 72 workshops, offering a multidisciplinary opportunity to skill up on the latest best practices and research in the crime victims’ field.

    If you are a California professional, you qualify for a $100 discount on registration.

    Here is more information:

    image002

    California Professionals Save Big!  

    As a California professional, you’re eligible for our deepest discount of this year’s National Training Institute in Anaheim, California, September 9-11. Save $100 off registration rates currently $325 for members and $450 for non-members. Lock in now to save! Enter password 2015NTICA to receive discount.

    Continuing Education Units (CEU’s) are offered and agencies may also use VOCA funds to cover registration costs.

    RegisterView Agenda

    The National Center for Victims of Crime’s 2015 National Training Institute features more than 130 leading experts and 72 workshops, offering a multidisciplinary opportunity to skill up on the latest best practices and research in the crime victims’ field. Topics include:

    • Strategies for Reaching Underserved Victims of Crime – Anita Ahuja, California Victim Compensation and Government Claims Board
    • Emerging Issues in Restitution for Crime Victims – Paul Cassell, University of Utah College of Law; Elizabeth Jones, Western State College of Law and Antonio R. Sarabia II, IP Business Law Inc.
    • Immigrant Crime Visas: Law Enforcement’s Tool to Strengthen Community Policing – Leslye Orloff and Michael La Riviere, National Immigrant Women’s Advocacy Project
    • How to Improve Law Enforcement Response to Crime Victims When Encountering Language Barriers – Cannon Han, Asian Pacific Institute on Gender-Based Violence
    • Collaboration Multiplier – Jamecca Marshall and Benita Tsao, Prevention Institute
    • Serving Transgendered Survivors – Christopher B. Argyros and Mariana Marroquin, Anti-Violence Project
    • Strategies for Serving Immigrant Crime Survivors – Cecelia Friedman Levin, ASISTA Immigration Assistance and Andrea Carcamo, National Latin@ Network
    • Utilizing Marsy’s Law, the Four Court Systems and Creative Recovery Solutions to Assist Victims of Crime in a Court of Law – Nina Salarno Ashford and Harriet Salarno
    • The Organization, Operation and Victimization Process of Labor Trafficking  – Colleen Owens, Amy Farrell and Meredith Dank, Urban Institute
    • Many More…

    Connect with and learn from victim advocates, counselors, program managers, attorneys, social workers, psychologists, researchers, nurses, system-based service providers, and other leaders from across the country.    

    About the National Training Institute 

    The National Center for Victims of Crime’s National Training Institute is a forum for law enforcement, victim service professionals, allied practitioners, policymakers, and researchers to share current developments and build new collaborations. Our multidisciplinary approach is centered on victims, based on best practices, and informed by the latest research. Sessions highlight practical information to better support services for the wide range of people victimized by all types of crimes.   

  • Using “healing” to end the conversation … when the conversation is far from over

     

    my_karma_ran_over_your_dogma_bumper_sticker-p128963680737841341en8ys_400

    Here’s a hypothetical:

    Your boss borrows your car and runs over your beloved dog Rover in the company’s parking garage. When your boss returns the car, you ask him about your dead dog and the blood stains all over the bumper. He denies all knowledge.

    When confronted with video surveillance footage, your boss finally admits that he did run over your dog, but claims that “he thought he did the right thing for you and Rover.” He is not fired. In fact, he is backed up by the company and remains in his job for three more years, where he supervises your work and is your “go-between” to higher management.

    You can’t quit because you are under contract.

    After those three years, your boss resigns. But he keeps his paycheck and gets to go on all of the company golf outings free of charge.

    Soon after the resignation and well-publicized golf outings, your company invites you to come to a “healing meeting” where you are invited to heal from the pain of losing your dog. Your boss is invited, too. The company will be collecting donations for the “coffee fund” at the meeting, so attendees are asked to bring their checkbooks.

    Your company also invites the press. When the press calls you about the meeting, you tell them that you aren’t going. You are portrayed in the media as angry and ungrateful for not participating.

    Ridiculous? You bet it is.

    But let’s switch out a few things … say, using Kansas City/St. Joseph as an example … and see how perception changes:

    Your bishop knows that a priest in your parish has created child pornography involving your child and does not call the police.

    Fmr KC/St. Joseph Bishop Robert Finn: Call the cops? Nah. I might miss my tee time.
    Fmr KC/St. Joseph Bishop Robert Finn: Call the cops? Nah. I might miss my tee time.

    When confronted by the police, the bishop says that he did the right thing for the priest and the children involved. The police don’t buy his argument and arrest the bishop. He later pleads guilty to child endangerment and is sentenced to probation.

    The bishop is not fired from his job and is supported by his fellow bishops and the Vatican. But you’re rightfully angry. If you stop going to church and receiving the sacraments, your faith tells you that your eternal life is at risk. Remember: you’re under contract.

    Cardinal Timothy Dolan: Defended convicted bishop
    Cardinal Timothy Dolan: Defended convicted bishop

    The bishop finally resigns, but is allowed to do all of the fun stuff like keep his title, collect a paycheck, live in a fancy house, go to Rome and perform public ordinations.

    After the resignation, the bishop’s successor holds a “healing Mass” and invites you to attend. When you say, “Hell, no. There has been no accountability within your organization,” people say you are callous and unforgiving.

    See?

    Anchoring the argument with “healing”

    The conversation about sexual abuse and cover-up in Kansas City-St. Joseph is far from over, but by throwing out the word “healing,” interim Archbishop Joseph Naumann is slamming the door shut on discussion, reform, change, and accountability.

    Archbishop Joseph Naumann: Slap on a band-aid and open up those checkbooks, m'kay?
    Archbishop Joseph Naumann: Slap on a band-aid and open up those checkbooks, m’kay?

    Basically, he’s saying, “We healed and offered the victims healing. It’s time to move on (and raise money).”

    Really, that’s the gist of what he said:

    [Naumann]’s encouraging the grieving and still angry parishioners to reach toward their faith.

    “I think we need to ask the Lord to help each of us to heal. There are people who have experienced wounds on both sides,” Naumann said in an interview Monday at the Diocese headquarters in downtown Kansas City.

    “A great resource is our prayer. Prayer can be helpful to become focused on moving forward and not (revisiting) those things in the past,” Naumann says, “unless we can learn from them.”

    “At this point,” he says, “if there are people who chose not to give because of Bishop Finn’s leadership, this may be a moment to re-examine that.”

    Why the anchor is false

    Minnesota Public Radio reporter Madeleine Baran made a very interesting point about the term “healing” at the 2015 SNAP conference in Washington DC.

    Peabody Award winner Madeleine Baran
    Peabody Award winner Madeleine Baran

    She remarked that groups who are in the wrong (and the journalists who cover them) will use the word “healing” as a way to end an argument or story arc and create the “next phase,” even if the story arc hasn’t finished.

    Even if there has been no accountability.

    Even if the group does not have the moral authority to determine healing times for those they have hurt.

    My suggestion? I encourage Archbishop Naumann to hold “meetings of accountability ” and “prayers for reform.”

    Healing can’t happen when a wound is still infected with cover-up.

    And the story? It’s far from over.

     

  • SNAP, SLAPP, and the ugly business of exposing abuse

     

    I was in an interview the other day when I was asked whether SNAP, the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests (the group for whom I have volunteered for the past 12 years) paid me.

    When I said, no—that I am, in fact, a volunteer with the organization—the writer said, “That’s good. You wouldn’t want to be seen as a professional victim.”

    I swallowed hard, and let it drop.

     

    SNAPblue

     

    Here’s the rub: SNAP is constantly being bashed by its opponents for being “professional victims.” But since when is taking a stand, demanding change and accountability, and running an organization been “being a professional victim?”

    No one looks at other great victim-based organizations like the National Center for Victims of Crime or RAINN: The Rape, Abuse and Incest National Network and says, “If you really care about the cause, you would work for free.” You certainly don’t look at your child’s teacher and say, “If you truly believed in education, you’d refuse a paycheck.”

    So why do people look at SNAP’s full time, professional (and sorely underpaid) staff differently? It’s time for that view to end.

    *******

    Which leads me to my next point: SNAP is successful. So successful, in fact, that its opponents have taken to SLAPP lawsuits to attempt to silence and bankrupt the organization.

    A SLAPP is a Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation.

    From the California Anti-SLAPP Project:

    While most SLAPPs are legally meritless, they can effectively achieve their principal purpose: to chill public debate on specific issues. Defending a SLAPP requires substantial money, time, and legal resources, and thus diverts the defendant’s attention away from the public issue. Equally important, however, a SLAPP also sends a message to others: you, too, can be sued if you speak up.

    In a new SLAPP lawsuit, SNAP leaders, an alleged victim’s parents, St. Louis police officers, and city officials are being sued by a St. Louis priest, Fr. Xiu Hui “Joseph” Jiang.

    Jiang's booking photo
    Jiang’s booking photo

    In June 2012, Fr. Jiang was arrested for repeatedly molesting Lincoln County girl and was also charged with “victim tampering.” The tampering charge was due to the fact that he gave the girl’s parents a check for $20,000 to ensure their silence. The parents turned the check over to police.

    He also admitted to molesting the girl, according to press reports.

    In November 2013, those charges were dismissed. Unfortunately, this is all too common in child sex abuse prosecutions.

    Then, in April 2014, he was arrested again on charges he repeatedly molested a St. Louis boy between 2011-2012. Those charges were dismissed in June 2015, but circuit attorney Jennifer Joyce said that her office “remains hopeful that charges will be refiled in the future.”

    The motivation for Jiang’s SLAPP lawsuit? From KMOX:

    Barbara Dorris of The Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests (SNAP) tells KMOX that she believes the suit is intended to send a message.

    “Our fear is that this is a way to intimidate victims, witnesses and whistle-blowers…into silence,” says Dorris. “If you tell the truth, we will sue you and I think it’s intended to silence people.”

    SNAP has never been terribly popular. They expose cover-up. They show how victims and the public have been betrayed by beloved religious leaders. They talk about ugly truths that keep children safer from abuse. They demand that wrong-doers—even well-loved wrong-doers—be held accountable.

    And they have changed the world in the process.

    Their first amendment right to continue in their work should never be silenced by a SLAPP.

    Want to help? SNAP could use your support. Even $5 makes a difference. Donate here.

     

     

  • The Not-So-Secret Institutional Code Words for Child Sex Abuse

     

    superman-tim-03

     

    There has been no shortage of news this summer when it comes to the US clergy sex abuse crisis. Although the Vatican is attempting to clean up the mess as much as possible before Pope Francis’ September visit (including accepting the resignations of the St. Paul and Minneapolis archbishop and bishop, as well as finally ousting the convicted Kansas City-St. Joseph bishop), very little has changed when it comes to zero tolerance.

    You can read about some of the recent scandals—where credibly accused priests remain in ministry—here, here, and here.

    We still need to remain vigilant. And as more victims in other organizations such as the Boy Scouts and religious groups besides the Catholic Church come forward and demand justice, it’s vital that we remember that our top priorities must always be child safety and victim healing.

    In light of this, let’s go back to basics: the Code Words.

    If you or your child are a part of an organization with an allegation of child sexual abuse, demand transparency … or leave the group. And if you’re wondering if your institution is transparent, keep an eye out for these cover-up Code Words. Not every code word means that there is sexual abuse, but every one of these code words can be a sign of real trouble and cover-up.

     

    • Boundary violation
    • Inappropriate touching
    • Victim alleged additional details, discredited
    • Long hugs
    • Kissing
    • Secrets
    • Confidential investigation
    • Accused is a minor
    • Tickling, horseplay, rough-housing
    • Questionable photos
    • Monitored employee
    • Not allowed to work with children
    • Immature (when describing an employee)
    • Consensual relationship with a teen/child
    • Well-developed child
    • Troubled/emotionally disturbed child or family
    • History of alcohol/drug abuse (in victim or alleged perpetrator)
    • Mature teen
    • Lap-sitting
    • Co-sleeping
    • Overnight, unsupervised trips
    • Affair with a teen/child
    • Inappropriate (and not described) conduct
    • Internal investigation (that is not made public)
    • Employee sent to undisclosed treatment
    • “Times were different”
    • After numerous interviews, child retracted the story
    • Complete review of personnel file (that is not made public)
    • Misunderstood affection

    The code words fall into categories: victim blaming (victim changing story, mature teens, consensual relationships, affairs, emotional disturbance), ignorance (“times were different”), minimization (treatment, misunderstood affection, tickling, horseplay).

    I am more than happy to add to the list … so feel free to respond in the comments.