Author: Joelle Casteix

  • The lesson of Weinstein: Power, morality, and the fickle friendship of fame

    The lesson of Weinstein: Power, morality, and the fickle friendship of fame

    UPDATE: The board of The Weinstein Company has fired Harvey from the company he help found.

    Hollywood’s deafening silence this week in the case of Harvey Weinstein should be telling to everyone:

    It tells us a story about power.

    It tells us a story about morality.

    It tells us the story of fame’s fickle friendship.

    Power

    Weinstein’s saga tells us that the true currency in Hollywood is power.

    Until just a few days ago, Weinstein had it in spades. He hung out with the former president and Democratic presidential candidates. He decided who would become movie stars. He was a king maker. A power broker.

    When the allegations made the news, he thought he could use his power to sue The New York Times (who ran the initial story about years of alleged sexual harassment) and to silence his board (whom he thought would accept his “non-apology apology” and let him come back to work in a few weeks).

    But who looks at Ashley Judd and calls her a liar? And who looks at settlement after settlement, gag order after gag order, and says to themselves: all of these women are nuts?

    Apparently, Hollywood does.

    The people who stood next to Lady Gaga and Joe Biden at the Academy Awards and clapped and cried for victims of sexual assault are oddly silent today. The stars who made PSAs saying “It’s On Us,” are sitting around today saying, “Sorry Ashley, Rose McGowan, and the dozens of other women. This one’s on you. We need our jobs.”

    No late night jokes. No SNL skits.

    I guess it’s really not on them. It’s on the victims.

    It’s the same with Woody Allen and Roman Polanski. Both men still wield a great deal of power in Hollywood. They make moves that people like or that Hollywood likes. Even though another woman has come forward to name Polanski as the man who raped her, all we hear from Hollywood is crickets when it comes to Roman Polanski’s rape charges. Hollywood is too busy trying to get a job in his next movie.

    What about Bill Cosby?

    Bill Cosby and his PR team like to say that it was racism that lead to the attention that Hollywood and the media have given his accusers. I disagree. Cosby has no power in Hollywood anymore.

    Jokes about pudding pops won’t get you blackballed from the business.

    Harvey’s power is beginning to wane. We shall see.

    ***Update 6:53 pm: a few minutes after I wrote this original post, Harvey was fired. My take? The board knew what he was up to for years. They didn’t fire him because it was the right thing to do. They fired him because they had no other choice. Public shame will do that.

    Morality

    In his “Non-apology apology” statement, Weinstein said:

    I came of age in the 60’s and 70’s, when all the rules about behavior and workplaces were different. That was the culture then.

    Really? My dad sold operating room equipment in the 60s and 70s. He didn’t make anyone give him massages. Or watch him shower naked. The manager at local Sav-on who sold my sister and I ice cream cones didn’t require the trainees to come to his hotel room and watch him walk around naked.

    What was Weinstein’s culture? The Manson Family (minus the murder part, I hope)? This is the kind of business leader that people are looking up to? This kind of behavior was never okay. Period.

    Weinstein has showed us in this one statement that he has the same morality as the Catholic Bishops, who blamed the counterculture for priests molesting children in the 1960s and 70s. Because, you know, “that was how it was back then.”

    Or bishops who didn’t know that sex with children was a crime.

    Weinstein doesn’t care about what he did. He doesn’t think he was wrong. He’s just mad that he’s in trouble for it.

    His is a world without morality.

    The Fickle Friendship of Fame

    When I came forward publicly as a survivor of sex abuse in the Catholic Church, I learned who my real friends were.

    Weinstein’s accusers are learning that … to the extreme.

    Where are Ashley Judd’s friends and supporters? Why aren’t the late night hosts standing up for her? Lena Dunham (not one of my favorite people) is at least saying something. Where are the other Hollywood power players?

    I remember a few years ago when the Roman Polanski case was back in the news. His victim has asked that the charges be dropped—not because the incidents didn’t happen, but because she’s sick of the media circus.

    Can you blame her? Gore Vidal called her a “young hooker” in a TV interview and a “little hooker” and a “slut” in one of his books.

    Anjelica Huston said of finding Polanski with a 13-year-old girl in her house, “I thought nothing of it.”

    A telling statement, don’t you think? What else has she seen and experienced to become so calloused? So cruel?

    Why do we hail these people as artists? Perhaps I would be able to separate the artists from the individual if Hollywood were not constantly lecturing us on everything from our carbon footprint to the chad on our ballots.

    But Hollywood doesn’t care about any of the victims. They just care about their next jobs.

    What can you do?

    Vote with your wallet when it comes to Hollywood products. Tell Ashley she’s strong and that you support her. Tell Rose McGowan, the women who were gag ordered, the news anchor, and every other Hollywood victim you know how sorry you are and that you won’t tolerate this anymore.

    Stop the cycle of the abuse of power. Support women in Hollywood who push back.

    And help push back.

    #pushback

     

     

  • The next domino falls: Rockville Center NY

    The next domino falls: Rockville Center NY

    The Catholic Diocese of Rockville Center, NY has announced an Independent Reconciliation and Compensation Plan. These plans, administered by Ken Feinberg and funded by the individual dioceses, aim to compensate victims for abuse.  You can read more about them in my four-part series here.

    Victims of sexual abuse in the Long Island Catholic diocese of Rockville Center began receiving letters last week. I predicted this back in July. 

    Like the other plans in the Archdiocese of New York and the Diocese of Brooklyn, victims receiving letters are in “phase one.” These are men and women who have previously come forward to the diocese to say that they were sexually abused.

    Rockville Center, however, is a very unique place.

    Rockville Center: Used Intimidation to Trick and Silence Victims

    A 2003 Suffolk Grand Jury Report found, according to the New York Times:

    Roman Catholic Church officials on Long Island [protected] scores of pedophile priests for decades by using sham policies and a bogus ”intervention team” to trick and silence victims, cover up crimes, avoid scandals and hold down financial consequences.

    The panel said the Diocese of Rockville Centre — the nation’s sixth largest, with 1.3 million Catholics in 134 parishes in Nassau and Suffolk Counties — had protected at least 58 abusive priests with aggressive tactics that purported to help victims and their families but that actually used intimidation, claims of confidentiality, hush payments and other means to avoid lawsuits and publicity.

    Since 1990, the diocese has maintained a special ”uninsured perils fund” to cover sexual abuse claims, asbestos exposure and trampoline accidents, the grand jury found. It said the fund, raised from parish collections, had paid $1.7 million in claims — none for asbestos exposure or trampoline accidents — but still had $11 million in its account last October.

    As for dangerous priests, it said they were shuffled from parish to parish and often allowed to minister to children, while recommendations for psychiatric treatments were ignored and a ”legal affairs” team, ostensibly set up to help sexual abuse victims, worked to suppress legal claims and husband the money.

    ”The grand jury concludes that the history of the Diocese of Rockville Centre demonstrates that as an institution they are incapable of properly handling issues relating to the sexual abuse of children by priests,” the special grand jury said in a 180-page report based on a nine-month inquiry.

    The facts are ugly. You can read the whole report here.

    The Players

    We have no idea how many priests sexually abused children in the Diocese of Rockville Center. The Grand Jury Report lists many of the men as “Priests A-W.” Here is a list of some of the known diocesan priests who are publicly accused of abuse. More details on the public allegations against each of the priests is here.

    Peter A. Allen

    Daniel Babis

    James Bergin

    Brian Brinker

    John Butler

    Michael Carroll

    Gerald (Jerry) Chasse

    Basil Peter Congro

    Damian Lawrence Cooper

    Edward D’Andrea

    Thomas DeVita

    Angelo Ditta

    Peter Duvelsdorf

    Matthew Fitzgerald

    Michael Hands

    Kenneth Hasselbach

    William Logan

    John Mahoney

    Joseph McComiskey

    Brian McKeon

    George J. Michell

    Andrew Millar

    James C. Miller

    Salvatore J. Miraglia

    John D. Mott

    Joseph T. Mundy

    Kenneth T. Nee

    Louis I. Newman

    Frank J. Parisi

    Alan J. Placa

    Charles A. Ribaudo

    Brendan Riordan

    Robert Saccacio

    Thomas G. Saloy

    Richard Schaefer

    Alfred Soave

    Raymond Stegmann

    Gerald Twomey

    Nicholas Unterstein

    Eugene Vollmer

    James C. Williams

    Gregory Yacyshyn

     

    Alan J. Placa

    By far the most interesting name on the list is Placa’s. A close friend of Rudy Giuliani’s, Placa has been accused of molesting teens. He is currently employed by Giuliani’s consulting firm.

    Although Placa was “cleared” by Rome, Placa’s accusers have never been able to use the US courts to seek civil justice or to gain access to Placa’s secret files. Placa’s Vatican trial was secret.

    This is Placa’s alleged victims’ chance to demand accountability. Although victims will not gain access to the files in Placa’s case, the Diocese of Rockville Center is going to have to “put its money where its mouth is,” so to speak.

    What’s up in NY and Brooklyn?

    I don’t know. If I hear anything, I will post it here.

  • Exclusive: Accused Vatican diplomat wrote 2003 dissertation on sex abuse church laws

    Exclusive: Accused Vatican diplomat wrote 2003 dissertation on sex abuse church laws

    A Vatican priest and diplomat under suspicion for violating US child pornography laws wrote his 2003 doctoral dissertation on church laws addressing how the Holy See deals with clerics accused of molesting children.

    Monsignor Carlo Alberto Capella, recalled by the Vatican last week, wrote The criminal protection of ecclesiastical celibacy in the canonical laws of 1917 and 1983: historical-juridical study to complete his studies in Canon Law. I took screenshots, in case the link “disappears.”

    He finished his degree in 2004 and entered the diplomatic service soon after.

    For people not up-to-speed on the importance of this dissertation topic, here’s a primer:

    In 1917, Pope Benedict XV wanted to consolidate his problem-solving. Some of his biggest problems had to do with child sexual abuse. He put the jurisdiction of these crimes, or “delicts,” under its own tribunal.

    The laws on dealing with the “delicts against the Sixth Commandment,” as they were called (that’s adultery, for those of us who had to look it up), were streamlined into a single code in 1917 and then again in 1983.

    Both the Vatican and the US Conference of Catholic Bishops are nice enough to explain the whole thing. I recommend reading the USCCB version.

    What does this mean?

    What does this mean? It means a million things.

    But here’s the worst (besides all of Francis’s broken promises about cooperating with civil authorities):

    It means that—quite possibly—a diplomat tasked with handling these cases may instead be a culprit.

  • Exact Vatican Tribunal Charges Against Guam Archbishop Unknown

    Exact Vatican Tribunal Charges Against Guam Archbishop Unknown

    Even I was guilty of assuming that Archdiocese of Agaña (Guam) Archbishop Anthony Apuron was charged with child sexual abuse in his current and highly publicized Vatican Tribunal.

    But then I learned:

    Charges in a Vatican Tribunal are secret.

    Apuron’s replacement confirmed it.

    From The Tablet (UK):

    Asked if [Guam] archbishop [Anthony Apuron] was also being charged for financial mismanagement, not just alleged child abuse, Archbishop Byrnes told reporters he did not know what the charges ended up being, but that they would be published eventually after the Vatican judges deliberated. (emphasis mine)

    Guam’s Catholics and the public are under the assumption that Apuron’s Vatican trial is for child sexual abuse. The Vatican and Apuron’s lawyers, I believe, are taking that assumption and running with it.

    Byrnes admitted that he has no idea what the charges against Apuron are. He is the highest ranking cleric in the Archdiocese of Agaña, Guam. He was the man hand-picked to replace Apuron.

    And he says has NO IDEA WHAT THE CHARGES ARE.

    Coadjutor Archbishop Michael Byrnes. He doesn’t know what the charges are, either.

    What about the victim depositions?

    Although Apuron’s alleged victims have been deposed (without their legal counsel, of course, and under the “Pontifical Secret”), they could be supplementary witnesses in the other possible charges against Apuron. Remember, he has been accused of everything from financial mismanagement to “widespread disarray of church operations.”

    If we don’t know what the charges are, how can we even be assured of the outcome?

  • What’s going on in the Philippines, Part Two: The Horror Story

    What’s going on in the Philippines, Part Two: The Horror Story

    Rita Milla had a horror story.

    It was a story that no one could believe.

    It was 1978. The California teenager said she was being sexually abused by seven priests from the Philippines. She was 16.

    Who would believe a horrible story like that?

    The abuse continued.

    Then she got pregnant. One of the priests, Santiago Tamayo, urged her to have an abortion. When she wouldn’t, he and the father of the child, Father Valentine Tugade, convinced Rita’s mother to send the now-19-year-old to the Philippines, where she could have the child in secret. Rita’s mother didn’t know her daughter was pregnant.

    Rita gave birth to a healthy and beautiful daughter. In 1983, Rita went public.

    Milla and her family demanded answers from the Archdiocese. All hell broke loose.

    Scattered priests

    The priests scattered … All under the protection of the Archdiocese of Los Angeles and bishops in the Philippines.

    Why? Rita’s allegations had merit.

    Santiago Tamayo fled to Hawaii and then the Philippines. There, he continued to act as a priest, with the blessing of his local bishop and a monthly check from the Archdiocese of Los Angeles.

    According to The Daily Breeze:

    That was around the same time that Tamayo and the other priests fled to the Philippines to escape criminal investigation and civil litigation.

    Tamayo’s file is dominated by memos and correspondence between Cardinal Roger Mahony and Monsignor Thomas Curry, the vicar of clergy, on how to keep Tamayo out of the country. There is also a letter in the file written to the cardinal in 2002 from a man alleging he was also abused by Tamayo. | Related: Exhibit 50, Page 18

    Tamayo he continued to work as a priest in the Philippines. He died in 1996.

    Another one of the accused, Fr. Angel Cruces was an extern priest (a “borrowed” priest) from the Diocese of Nueva Segovia, Philippines.

    Fr. Angel’s file, released in 2013, tells quite the story.

    The Archdiocese of Los Angeles said he could no longer minister there in 1984, when Rita went public. But that didn’t stop his home diocese in the Philippines from giving the priest a letter of recommendation to work in Brooklyn in the 1990s. That’s the only way that Cruces could end up in Brooklyn. He would need a “letter of good standing” from his home bishop.

    The file also shows that Fr. Angel’s archbishop in the Philippines attempted to step in and asked Los Angeles to make the whole situation “go away.”

    A DNA test proved that Father Valentine Tugade was the father of Rita’s daughter. He never apologized. Like the rest of Rita’s accused assailants, he fled to the Philippines to escape prosecution. Tugade’s whereabouts are unknown. But he may have ended up back in California. It’s quite possible he’s dead.

    He certainly wasn’t kicked out of the priesthood for fathering a child with an unwilling woman. Readers of this blog series already knew that wasn’t an issue. The Catholic Church in the Philippines has long allowed a “one-child” policy for its priests.

    Rita is doing great, by the way. She’s a strong, smart, and engaging woman, who never ceases to amaze me.