Category: Uncategorized

  • The California Clergy Sex Abuse Powder Keg

    The California Bishops Conference thought “it” was all over in 2007 …

    The Golden State, chiefly forgotten since the 2007 $660 million settlement against the Archdiocese of Los Angeles, has been overshadowed lately by a devastating grand jury report in Philadelphia, large civil child sex abuse settlements in Delaware and the Pacific Northwest, and the international scandal sweeping Europe and Australia.  The thousands of pages of clergy sex abuse and cover-up documents that victims were promised as a part of the 2007 LA Archdiocese settlement have been languishing in legal limbo.

    But slowly and quietly, the scandal in California is heating up again.  In the past few months alone, California courts have witnessed criminal convictions, on-going and upcoming civil sex abuse trials, and yes, the continued cover-up.

    California is a clergy sex abuse powder keg ready to explode.

    Unmonitored Predators Roaming Free

    Last month, an Associated Press investigation, which started with a few of the legal documents available from the Los Angeles Archdiocese 2007 litigation, found:

    …nearly 50 former priests and religious brothers from the LA archdiocese who live and work in 37 towns and cities across California, unsupervised by law enforcement or the church.

    Another 15 are scattered in cities and towns from Montana to New York, while 80 more cannot be located despite an exhaustive search by attorneys representing those who have sued them for abuse.

    But that is just the beginning.

    Criminal Convictions – One South, One North

    In the first two weeks of May 2011, two California priests were criminally convicted on charges of child sex abuse.  In San Bernardino (in Southern California’s Inland Empire), Fr. Alejandro (Alex) Castillo pled guilty to lewd conduct with a boy under 14.  The crimes took place in 2008.  The priest, who denied the allegations until the plea deal was announced, collected more than $20,000 from his friends and supporters to pay his bail in October 2010.  The “Coalition to Exonerate Fr. Alex” has been quiet since the plea agreement was reached. Sentencing is scheduled for June 2011.

    Castillo had a long career in Los Angeles, Sacramento and San Bernardino.  Because he avoided a trial, Castillo’s past and any cover-up will remain secret unless other victims come forward or a civil suit is filed.

    On May 5, 2011 in Northern California’s Monterey County, Fr. Antonio Cortes was sentenced to a year in jail for molesting a boy in 2009.  According to press reports, the Diocese of Monterey is paying the priest $2500/month in living expenses.

    Northern California: Wine, Agriculture, and a Whole Lotta Cover-up

    The Diocese of Monterey has other problems.  Fr. Edward Fitz-Henry, a priest originally from Ireland, has been accused of sexual abuse by two children, 20 years apart.   Police are investigating the second report.  The discrepancies begin with the accounts of what diocese officials knew about Fitz-Henry, when they knew it, and whether or not they did anything about it.  According to the church’s own reports, Fitz-Henry was sent to treatment for sex abusers after the first allegations surfaced, but the bishop allowed him to remain in ministry.  All the while, Monterey’s Bishop Garcia told parishioners that no priest credibly accused of abuse is allowed to work in the diocese. A civil suit has been filed.

    In the Diocese of Stockton, Fr. Leo Suarez was removed from ministry in 2010 when he admitted in 2009 he had sexually abused a girl in 1991.  The diocese claims that they have no idea where Suarez is now and that he will not be allowed to work as a priest.

    But just like Monterey, Stockton’s troubles are only starting.  A judge has ruled that there is enough evidence for a civil sex abuse trial to proceed against popular priest Fr. Michael Kelly and the Diocese.  Although there is enough evidence for a civil child sex abuse trial, Bishop Stephen Blaire thinks that there is not enough evidence to put the priest on leave.  Kelly is still the pastor of St. Joachim’s Parish in Lockeford.

    A few miles away in Fresno, Fr. Eric Swearingen is still working as a priest, even after a jury found 9-3 that he had sexually abused a boy.   The victim said that he would settle for $1 if the diocese would simply remove Swearingen from the priesthood.  The trial ended in a mistrial, because jurors could not decide if the Diocese of Fresno was liable for Swearingen’s behavior. Bishop John Steinbock decided that the jury had it wrong and let the priest keep his job.   Steinbock passed away in 2010.

    Head down south, and it doesn’t get any better.

    Sun, Sand and Abuse in Southern California

    In the Archdiocese of Los Angeles, Martin O’Loghlen, a priest who admitted in the mid-1990s to sexually abusing a teenage girl and to being a sex addict, was only removed as a priest at Holy Name Parish and school in San Dimas when the New York Times called and asked questions.  The Times also found out that O’Loghlen served on the Sex Abuse Advisory Board for the Archdiocese while he was being sued for child sex abuse (a case that eventually settled) and after he had admitted the crimes.

    The Archdiocese claimed ignorance and clerical errors, and “fired” the vicar for clergy. Unfortunately, their claims of ignorance don’t hold water: the Archdiocese had participated in the sex abuse lawsuit, the victim had been trying for years to get O’Loghlen removed, officials had full knowledge and documentation of the abuse and they even listed O’Loughen as an accused priest in their “Report to the People of God.”

    In Orange County, civil child sex abuse trials are scheduled in July 2011 against Fr. Alexander Manville and admitted serial predator Fr. Gus Krumm, two Franciscan priests.  Krumm worked at Saints Simon and Jude Parish in the Diocese of Orange for 10 years, even though he had been implicated in a report about sexual abuse at St. Anthony Seminary in 1993. Orange Diocese officials kept Krumm in ministry for years after learning of a subsequent sex abuse settlement with one of Krumm’s victims.  Krumm later admitted the abuse.

    The Franciscans fought all the way to the California Supreme Court to keep documents about their abusive clerics secret.  They lost.  Documents outlining the misdeeds of men such as Krumm, Manville and seven others, as well as the cover-up that ensued, should be available to the public later this year.

    Former Orange County super-priest Michael Harris has two sex abuse trials scheduled for October 2011 and February 2012.  Harris, who was the long-standing principal at Mater Dei High School in Santa Ana and the founding principal of Santa Margarita High School in South Orange County has been accused of abuse by more than ten kids.  Settlements against him have cost the Diocese of Orange and Archdiocese of Los Angeles somewhere around the neighborhood $10 million.

    Civil sex abuse trials are also pending in Los Angeles against the Archdiocese and incarcerated priest predator Michael Baker (the priest who self-disclosed to Cardinal Mahony in 1986, and then went on to abuse until 2001).   Three sex abuse and cover-up cases against Baker and the Archdiocese and are scheduled to go to trial in June 2012, according to the victims’ attorneys.

    A civil sex abuse and cover-up trial is also scheduled in July 2011 against the Archdiocese and Fr. Fernando Lopez Lopez, who began abusing kids in Los Angeles soon after his arrival from Italy in 2001.  He was arrested in 2004, convicted, and later deported.

    Numerous cases are pending against Nicolas Aguilar-Rivera, a visiting Mexican priest who has been accused by at least 13 kids in the Archdiocese of Los Angeles.  He fled the country after a warrant was issued for his arrest.  These cases are relevant internationally because the victims allege that Aguilar-Rivera was protected by a Mexican Cardinal and hidden in LA.

    Did you get all of that?

    Honorable Mentions

    I did neglect some of the honorable mentions, like the two California priests – one deported and convicted in England (James Robinson) and one fighting deportation (Patrick McCabe).  Or Orange County Priest Luis Ramirez, who recently finished serving his sentence for a 2008 plea bargain for which Anaheim police and prosecutors wanted the priest a registered sex offender for life.

    And let’s not forget the big one: we are still waiting for the Los Angeles Archdiocese 2007 secret personnel files … But that’s a story for another day.

  • The Better Path to Sainthood

    Note: The following post was scheduled to be published by a major metropolitan newspaper.  Recent world events bumped it permanently.  I am okay with that.

    The beatification of Pope John Paul II upset and outraged thousands of victims of sexual abuse in the Catholic Church around the world … and rightfully so.  Media coverage, history and the church’s own documents show that John Paul II oversaw a global church that covered-up for and facilitated thousands of cases of childhood sexual abuse.  I am one of the voices of outrage.

    I am a victim of childhood sexual abuse in the Catholic Church; and since 2003, I have been a volunteer public spokesperson and survivor advocate.  It’s not a glamorous gig. My office is my kitchen table. I have suffered bed bugs and heat in Florida and sub-zero temperatures in Alaska Native Villages with no running water. I have trudged on and off of trains in Europe, sat alone in public meeting rooms in Guam, visited Native American Indian Reservations in South Dakota and have been stranded in more airports than I can count.

    What does it mean when an ordinary survivor like me can show that she has traveled father and done more to meet with the Church’s victims than the Pope? Or that I can name at least 200 of my friends and colleagues who are braver, stronger, smarter, and far more photogenic than I am — and who have done more, traveled farther and endured more than I could ever attempt?

    It means that John Paul II should not become a saint. Period.

    It’s About the Institutional Cover-Up, Stupid

    Since 2002, the world has watched as Catholic Church officials have been forced to come clean about child sexual abuse and cover-up.  Some church officials only begrudgingly turned over secret abuse files because brave victims used the tried-and-true civil justice system.  Other church officials were forced by law enforcement or required by criminal courts.  But let’s face it:  Transparency did not come voluntarily.  In fact, I cannot recall a single predator’s secret personnel file that was made public by a voluntary move on the part of a bishop.  My research has yet to find a single priest file that was voluntarily turned over – in its entirety – to law enforcement because of “church reforms.”

    In fact, most Catholic Church officials still refuse to make public a centuries-old strategy and policy of wrongdoing, abuse and cover-up.  This strategy of secrecy and abuse came right from the Vatican and it is protecting predators RIGHT NOW.  The time to condone this strategy is over.

    Exposing the sex abuse crisis in the Catholic Church is not about politics, nor is an assault on religion or faith.  It is about the institutional cover-up of abuse, abusers and evidence. The transparency and accountability we demand are components of morals, ethics and justice.  It is about the safety of children and the healing of the most vulnerable and fragile among us.  It is about adhering to the law.

    Charity and good works mean nothing when we are forced to pay for them with the lives of our children. Since the citizenry of the United States demands accountability from every other aspect of our society, it is now time to demand it from Catholic Church officials.  The American people don’t wax poetic about the career of Richard Nixon and ignore Watergate.  And we can’t do the same thing here.

    The Better Path

    Unfortunately, there is little we can do to stop John Paul II’s path to sainthood.  But there is much we can do to expose his crimes of omission and complicity, as well as the crimes of his colleagues.  We can allow victims their day in court by reforming our criminal and civil laws.  We can strengthen existing laws against predators and those who cover up for them.  We can work with Congress to ensure that we have national standards to protect children from sexual abuse. We can work to revoke the nonprofit status of ANY organization that has been shown to allow abuse, transfer abusers and cover-up crimes.  We can support victims in other countries who are also speaking out for children.  We can encourage grand juries across the United States to do what the mostly Catholic Philadelphia Grand Jury has done – investigate abuse, expose predators, and indict criminals.

    As a nation, we can refuse to allow victims of sexual abuse in the Catholic Church to be marginalized.  We can tell church officials that the survivors DO matter, whether the abuse occurred yesterday or in 1945.  As a nation, we can embrace the hurting child in every victim of childhood sexual abuse, because the pain never goes away.

    If we do these small and simple things, we will have done far more than Catholic Church officials – or Pope John Paul II – have ever done.  And we can all be on the better path to sainthood.

  • Worldwide Mushroom Farming

    Or: Lay review boards: Cover them in crap and keep them in the dark.

    Welcome to mushroom farming, Catholic style: the “lay review board.”

    What is a lay review board?  Well, in the United States, reviews boards were installed in every diocese – as well as a national review board – by the US Conference of Catholic Bishops.  They are  “confidential and consultative” boards who “review claims and make recommendations” to the bishop about the sexual abuse of children.

    There has to be the perfect cliche about what they really are, but currently, it’s a toss-up between “smoke and mirrors” and “don’t look at the man behind the curtain.”  In Europe, they have even less power, as we are seeing in recent events in Belgium.

    But I digress.  Right now, they are a bunch of do-nothings.

    Let’s look at worldwide events involving review boards during the past six months:

    • A former judge/member of the Los Angeles lay review board has acknowledged in the media and under oath he never called the cops when he learned about abusive priests. Hello?!! What law school did you go to, Richard Byrne?
    • In Belgium, the archbishop’s office, plus his home and a tomb, were raided by the cops to get his secret sex abuse documents and the documents that belong to his special lay commission to investigate child sex abuse across Belgium.
    • Current lay review board members here in Orange County (which include people whose job it is to protect kids like the CEO of the Foundation that runs the largest orphanage/childrens home in the county) have refused to demand that Tod Brown open his secret personnel files (you know, the naughty naughty files that live under lock and key in his office).  Yes, he turned over SOME when the courts demanded it … but why aren’t they able to review the rest?  Why don’t they ask?
    • In Baker, Oregon, why are Catholics and board members demanding that the bishop turn over all documents about a controversial deacon who has been removed from two other dioceses for covering up abuse?
    • Current board members in Boise, Idaho also swim in complacency. Why aren’t they raving mad that Bishop Michael Driscoll only suspended an abuser still in ministry when the newspaper exposed him?
    • Why aren’t the Orange board members demanding the truth about the Boise cover up? I mean really – their bishop, TOD BROWN, was the schmuck who covered up for an abuser who recently re-offended. Isn’t that important?  Who else has Brown covered up for?
    • Oh yeah, I forgot: Brown also has an allegation of abuse against him. But I will bet you dollars to donuts that the lay review board hasn’t seen a single personnel document about Brown.
    It’s enough to make you wonder – are they slipping roofies into the coffee at these board meetings?  There’s no other way to explain the total lack of action.

    Or maybe they are so covered in crap, they simply don’t know the difference anymore.

    Here’s my take: if you are not a part of the solution, you’re part of the problem.  It’s time for these boards to demand they are part of the solution.

    Up next: My experience on a lay review board.  It’s almost embarrassing.

    … and some good news: Awesome brother-in-law George built me this great new web site.  Thanks Web Mechanic!

  • A few things you may not know about me:



    1. I think of myself as a fiction writer and an opera singer FIRST, then an advocate.  (Obviously, I’m not that good at the first two, but I think big);
    2. I love my soap opera  (All My Children, FYI);
    3. I have raised complaining to an art form;
    4. Waiting tables was an awesome job;
    5. I am one thesis away from an MA in Literature.  And I will never write it;
    6. I am far too rebellious for corporate America;
    7. Facebook is an addiction;
    8. There is nothing in this world that has changed me more (for the better) than my son.  He is the most amazing, funny, sweet, smart creature on the planet.  I would die for him;
    9. Perfectionism has been my curse in life.  It sucks and makes my life really difficult.  I think about things WAY too much;
    10. I like talking about my intestinal distress at parties.  It’s the instant ice-breaker,
    11. Celebrity gossip is awesome, and I soak it up like a sponge;
    12. I have a hard time telling my right from my left;
    13. I grew up in a Santa Ana neighborhood that produced a lot of uber successful kids.  Must be something in the water.  I didn’t drink the water;
    14. I work out a lot.  But you can’t really tell.  Because I also eat a lot;
    15. I realize that life isn’t fair.  But injustice and cover-up chaw my hide.  That’s why I keep working.  I just can’t let the bad people win.