Category: Child safety

  • Fifteen Years After Dallas, Part One: The Altoona-Johnstown Grand Jury Report

    Read the Introduction to this series here.

    In 2016, the Pennsylvania Office of the Attorney General announced that “a statewide investigating grand jury has determined that hundreds of children were sexually abused over a period of at least 40 years by priests or religious leaders assigned to the Roman Catholic Diocese of Altoona-­Johnstown.”

    The two-year investigation included a search warrant of the Altoona Bishop’s “secret archive.” That secret archive is the file cabinet under lock and key in the bishop’s office that holds evidence of child sex abuse and cover-up, including letters, reports, photos, records, statements, memos, etc. A bishop is required to keep this file under Canon Law.

    The report also determined former Altoona Bishop Joseph Adamec was at the forefront of the cover-up and acted to avoid scandal rather than protect children.

    The widespread abuse involved at least 50 priests or religious leaders and endangered thousands of children and allowed proven child predators to abuse additional victims.

    The complete grand jury report can be read here.

    Reforms Take a Year … Yet Look Oddly Familiar

    A year later, in 2017, Bishop Mark L. Bartchak of Altoona-Johnstown Diocese announced “reforms” in conjunction with the Attorney General’s office.

    Bishop Mark L. Bartchak

    Those reforms included:

    1. The creation of an independent, multidisciplinary oversight board;
    2. The retention of an outside expert to develop a new, comprehensive child abuse prevention program;
    3. A reporting protocol that requires the Diocese to report allegations of child sexual abuse to law enforcement within twelve hours after receipt; and
    4. Counseling and support services for victims by qualified and independent mental health professionals chosen by the victims.

    Sound familiar? They should.

    All of the above items were already a part of the 2002 Dallas Bishops’ Charter for the Protection of Children and Young People and its Norms.

     You can read the Charter here–note where you can find the corresponding reforms:

    Item A is Dallas Charter Norm Number 4;

    Item B is Dallas Charter Articles 9 and 12;

    Item C is Dallas Charter Articles 2 and 4; and

    Item D is Dallas Charter Article 1.

     

    So … it takes Bishop Mark L. Bartchak a year to copy and paste reforms from 2002?

    Hundreds of kids are sexually abused in his diocese and all he can do is rewrite his own booklet?

    I guess the next question is: how much has he spent to lobby against legislative reform for victims of child sexual abuse in Pennsylvania? Wait … I don’t want to know.

    Next up, Part Two: Crooked dealings in Crookston

  • Fifteen Years After Dallas, A Seven-Part Series: Introduction

    The 2002 Dallas Bishops’ Conference was a barn-burner. On the heels of the Spotlight series and scandals in dioceses across the nation, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) got together at their annual June meeting to put together “massive reforms.”

    Protesters at 2002 Bishops’ Meeting in Dallas

    Those reforms became the Charter for the Protection of Children and Young People and its accompanying Norms. It was later referred to as the 2002 Dallas Charter.

    CrimeCon to BishopCon

    Flash forward to 2017. The bishops’ June meeting is currently underway in Indianapolis. As luck or fate would have it, I found myself in the same city, at their very hotel (The JW Marriott Downtown) as the 2017 USCCB June Conference. I am in town attending CrimeCon 2017 (a conference for true crime aficionados) to meet some people interested in my work. (And wouldn’t you know it, The Keepers was the talk of the conference.)

    Less than 3 hours after CrimeCon checked out last night, the bishops began checking in.

    While the USCCB official schedule says the spring meeting doesn’t begin until June 14, they are well entrenched in the third floor conference center of the hotel, where CrimeCon signs still point people to the USCCB conference rooms (ah, the irony). Meetings are going on as I type.

     

    So in honor of the 15th anniversary of the 2002 Dallas Charter, I thought I would take a look at some recent scandals that show us that the problem is far from over and that any glad-handing on behalf of the members of the USCCB this week is just for show.

    Nothing has changed, except the window dressing.

    The Charter, which the Bishops have been hailing as “watershed” document in child protection, I contend, is a massive failure.

    Fifteen years after Dallas, the protesters may be gone, but the disgust remains.

    Up next: Part One ~ Altoona-Johnstown

  • Banned priest and admitted abuser slated for San Gabriel Mission award

    Banned priest and admitted abuser slated for San Gabriel Mission award

    Not fake news. They’re really doing it. And Edward James Olmos is gonna be there, too.

    Bruce Wellems is a problematic guy, to say the least.

    He’s been banned from the Archdiocese of Los Angeles. He’s been removed from ministry in the Archdiocese of Chicago and by the Claretian order. Last year, he was sued for child sex abuse by one of his alleged victims.

    He’s even admitted to molesting the alleged victim.

    But the San Gabriel Mission (where he was working when he was banned from Los Angeles—and whose leadership is well aware of everything I have written here) is still honoring him at their May 25 Build the Dreams Scholarship Fundraiser, alongside actor Edward James Olmos.

    My sources tell me that Olmos has known for more than a year about Wellems. We will see if he pulls out of the event.

    The folks at the mission are going to say that Wellems is not to blame here because the abuse happened before Wellems was a priest. Wellems was 15 and the victim was seven years old.

    But I ask you this: does that make the abuse feel any different to the seven-year-old?

    I will also say this: in all of the interviews that Wellems has done regarding the abuse and the lawsuit, not once has he apologized to the victim. Not once has he acknowledged that he hurt a little boy and his family. Not once has he said he was sorry. And at every turn, he has minimized the abuse, called himself a victim, and spent years covering it up when his victim sought justice.

    But if two archdioceses and a religious order decide independently that Bruce Wellems is unfit for the priesthood, something tells me that there is much more here than meets the eye.

    If Archbishop Gomez and Cardinal Cupich are half the pastoral leaders they claim to be, they’ll step in and put an end to this nonsense immediately.

     

  • New lawsuit rocks Orange, LA dioceses – sex abuse, wrongful death

    New lawsuit rocks Orange, LA dioceses – sex abuse, wrongful death

    The problem with child sex abuse is that for the victims and their families, the pain never goes away.

    This month, the family of one of the alleged victims of one of Orange County’s most notorious predator priests filed a wrongful death lawsuit against the Diocese of Orange and the Archdiocese of Los Angeles.

    The wife alleges that her husband committed suicide as a result of years of inner torture after being sexually abused as a child by Fr. Eleuterio Ramos in the 1970s at Placentia’s St. Joseph’s Parish.

    Fr. Eleuterio “Big Al” Ramos was a bad dude and left debris and disaster at every church where he was assigned.

    This is the second lawsuit in just a few weeks. Will the Diocese of Orange try lie to the press about this one, too?

    Sure, the Diocese of Orange and the Archdiocese of Los Angeles consider the crimes of Fr. Richard Coughlin of the All-American Boys Chorus and Fr. Eleuterio “Big Al” Ramos “old news,” but for his victims and their families, the pain is  breaking news, every day.

  • The All-American Boys Chorus and the Cycle of Abuse

    The All-American Boys Chorus and the Cycle of Abuse

    The recent lawsuit against Fr. Richard T. Coughlin, The All-American Boys Chorus, and the Diocese of Orange has sparked a flurry of conversation and controversy online.

    Why? A whole generation of kids was destroyed by Coughlin.

    And of course, a lot of people were quick to defend the chorus and say, “Things are different now.”

    But they’re not.

    Singers can be Easy Prey

    Choruses can be funny things. I am a singer, so I know. I was sexually abused in a chorus, targeted by a director who saw I was an easy mark.

    Singing and the teaching of singing are very personal and very hands-on. It’s one-on-one (and before the days of awareness about sexual abuse, it was done behind closed doors). It’s not unusual for a vocal coach to touch a student (in a NON-SEXUAL WAY) to show a concept. It’s very personal and can get very emotional. Your body is your instrument. If a piano is out of tune, you hire a tuner. If your voice is out of tune … well, it’s personal.

    The scandal in the chorus is very similar to what you’re seeing in U.S. Gymnastics.

    The problem with the All-American Boys Chorus is that things really haven’t changed since Coughlin led the group. The culture that Fr. Coughlin created has continued in the decades after he left.

    One example: Roger Alan Giese was a vocal coach for the chorus. He had been giving voice lessons to members for years. He was arrested in 2007 on multiple counts of sexual assault on a member of the chorus. Read the charges. They are gross. He conned his victim into thinking that Giese was a member of Delta Force.

    Richard Alan Giese

    After Giese was arrested, he emptied his bank accounts and fled to England. Officials there won’t extradite him due to our civil commitment law. He’s since changed his name and works for a PR firm. (Of all of the serial offenders I have tracked, I can’t think of a single one who got put away on civil commitment.)

    Here is the rub: Giese was hired by the same people who were carefully chosen by Coughlin to turn a blind eye to how he was grooming and abusing chorus members. These were same people who should have implemented policies and procedures after Coughlin’s removal to ensure that the abuse NEVER HAPPENED AGAIN. But they didn’t.

    Giese was exhibiting “red flag” behavior by telling the victim that he was a member of Delta Force; by having the victim and his brother for overnight visits; and by asking for samples of their body fluids. Yet, the chorus staff had NO POLICIES in place to forbid—or even notice—these behaviors.

    What else has been happening in the chorus that we don’t know about? This is a touring group that goes outside of the country to perform. What else is going on when parents aren’t looking?

    And who else used the chorus to molest innocent boys in far away locales?

    The most tragic part of this story is that Giese was a singer in the chorus when he was boy. I do not believe the argument that being sexually abused as a child makes one more likely to become an abuser as an adult. But I do believe that Giese may have already had those tendencies.

    And I believe Giese knew that The All-American Boys Chorus would be the easiest place to find prey.

    So now we know that two alleged sex offenders—one with multiple accusations in two states and another who is on the lam in a foreign country—used The All-American Boys Chorus to find easy prey. We know that the same people are in charge now in 2017, who were in charge in 1993 and in 2007 when Coughlin and Giese were targeting kids.

    Why would anyone take the risk of enrolling their kids in the choir?

    If you have any information on these men or anyone else who hurt kids, call the DA, the police, or contact me and I will point you in the right direction.