The Puppet Show: The Utter Failure of Diocese Lay Review Boards

Posted by Joelle Casteix on June 6, 2011 in Activism, Clergy Abuse Crisis | Subscribe

Last week in Kansas City-St. Joseph, the diocese lay review board was called to meet by the bishop to “discuss” recent events involving the sexual abuse of children. Too bad the board got wind of things a few years too late.

For those of you who don’t know, Fr. Sean Ratigan was arrested in late May for possession of hundreds of child sex abuse (child porn) images that he took of parish girls. According to a lawsuit filed last week, he uploaded and distributed those photos on the internet.

Bishop William Finn found out about the images in November 2010. Instead of calling the police, he made copies of the images (a federal crime, no?) and then gave Ratigan’s computer to Ratigan’s family, who destroyed it.

The diocese’s own document trail shows that the Bishop Finn was warned about Ratigan’s behavior at least a year ago, and possibly as long ago as 2007.

So when the Kansas City-St. Joesph diocese lay review board came together to meet just last week, one would think that they would demand some transparency, perhaps even publicly state that Finn be held accountable for his inaction and cover-up. Maybe call on him to turn over all files on Ratigan and other predators in the diocese. They should be angry, right?

Not so much.

Instead, the meeting resulted with the removal of a different priest who has been accused of abuse by at least three children and is the subject of a 2010 child sex abuse lawsuit.  This was a priest who should have been removed a long, long time ago. Instead, he was allowed to remain in ministry a year after the lawsuit was filed.

What’s going on here?

Bishop Finn’s actions in these cases are akin to calling the fire department well after the house has already burned to the ground. But instead of demanding accountability, Kansas City-St. Joseph’s lay review board accepted an apology, quietly obeyed and thanked the bishop for the courtesy call.

An anomaly? Hardly. This case is spectacularly indicative of the uselessness and powerlessness of diocesan lay review boards. Acting as a bishop’s puppet show, they give the false air of transparency. Behind the scenes, it’s business as usual: cover-up, complicity and abuse.

I know this because as a former lay review board member in Orange, California, and a victim of sexual abuse in the Catholic Church, I have seen it all firsthand.

Not an Isolated Case

Review boards across the country are coming under increased scrutiny as they are called to review cases well after the public and private damage has occurred, as well as for their refusal to be strong, critical and vocal advocates for the children they claim to serve.

In Gallup, NM, the board has been dormant for months, perhaps years.  Although The Gallup Independent exposed dozens of secret settlements with victims, no board members have publicly come forward to demand information about abusers, secret files or settlements.

In Philadelphia, the board was thrown under the bus when a grand jury report found that 37 priests in ministry had allegations of abuse.  The board knew nothing of many of the cases. Instead of demanding fundamental change, board members criticized Rigali, but praised the changes in the Archdiocese since 2005 and have justified their role in preventing abuse.

In Stockton, California, a judge has found that there is enough evidence for a civil sex abuse trial to proceed against Fr. Michael Kelly this summer. Stockton Bishop Stephen Blaire, however, has said that his review board has determined that Kelly is innocent and the priest remains in ministry.  Wouldn’t any prudent board demand that Kelly be put on administrative leave until the trial was over?

In Fresno, a priest who was found by a civil jury to have molested a child remains in ministry in a parish.  Bishop John T. Steinbock said that Eric Swearingen is innocent.  Does his board agree? Why hasn’t the board publicly criticized the (recently deceased) bishop for this?

We will never know.

How Are These Boards Set Up?

The Charter for the Protection of Children and Young People – a 2002 “reform” that has shown its flaws repeatedly during the past nine years – has carefully and meticulously ensured that lay review boards remain at the whim of the bishop.

Review boards are made up of former law enforcement officials, therapists, community members, child advocates and others who really care about the welfare of kids.  Many serving on the boards are mandatory reporters. But as a “consultative board” to the bishop, the bishop may use them at his discretion.  He doesn’t have to give them information. He is not mandated to tell them about allegations. He is not required to turn over secret personnel files. If the board recommends that a priest be removed, the bishop is not required to do so.

So why have a board at all?

The answer is simple: to provide a false veneer of legitimacy allowing bishops to continue business as usual.

But that can change.

The Fuse Has Been Lit

It’s only a matter of time before we see more and more cases like Ratigan’s and the Archdiocese of Philadelphia. The failures of the John Jay Report and annual diocesan audits are blatantly clear. The Catholic laity is seeing, yet again, that their children were intentionally put at risk of abuse, while the local lay review board assigned to protect kids remained silent.

Lay review boards are ineffective as long as their membership refuses to publicly demand transparency. As long as board members sit and wait obediently and silently for their bishop to do the right thing – or assume that they have all of the material necessary to make informed decisions – more children will be put at risk.

To become effective, the boards must understand their mission. The obligation of the boards is NOT to the bishop. The true obligation of every lay review board is to the CHILDREN of the diocese and the VICTIMS who were so horribly hurt.  Once they actually understand their obligation and responsibility, suddenly, their requirement to speak out becomes painfully apparent.

I challenge every lay review board member to demand transparency and accountability from their bishop.  I urge them to demand legal documents, depositions, evidence and secret personnel files for EVERY priest in the diocese. I challenge them to become vocal advocates for change.

Instead of being a liability and a puppet of their bishops, these boards must become proactive advocates for the children they claim to serve.

Until then, men like Ratigan and the bishops who cover-up for them will continue to destroy our children, just like they have in Kansas City-St. Joseph.

 

10 Comments

  • grace says:

    great article.. your work shows the intelligence and truth of someone who has had first hand experience and knows what she is talking about..
    I personally think catholics are brainwashed to put their hierarchy before their own children otherwise why would any sane person listen to any catholic bishop about anything?

    The police need to be involved with every case of priest abuse and the police need to be detached from the catholic church and bishops.
    Our government needs to step in and take away the catholic church’s power hold on our country.

  • Amos says:

    The Jim Jones cult mentality is alive and well among the so called Diocesan Review Board members.

  • Mike Ference says:

    Finn is a terrorist. He should be waterboarded until he confesses all that he knows about crimes committed against innocent children by clergy in his diocese. Anyone suspected of covering up crimes against innocent children should also be waterboarded. That’s what we do to terrorists.

    Mike Ference

  • The Catholic church has actually invented a new crime – “conspiracy to hide child rape”.

    There has never been an other institution in the world that could claim that they actually conspired to commit and then hide the rape of tens of thousands of children. Only a handful of priests have ever spoken out against their method of handling it, which proves that its a conspiracy. They should be prosecuted using the RICO laws that are used against other organized crime units.

    Imagine if this happened at a Chucky Cheese Restaurant. Employees rape children. The management finds out about it and moves the employees to other restaurants. They hide the truth and they lie about it.

    Customers would boycott Chucky Cheese and have every manager thrown in jail, all the way up to the CEO.

    We can’t expect the Catholic church to rise to the standards of Chucky Cheese, but we should prosecute their new crime so that we can protect children in the future and get justice for victims of the past.

  • Kay4Justice says:

    If the police are contacted, as they should be, why the need for a review board? The one in my diocese (KC, MO) is dysfunctional at best because Finn never gives them any information or cases to review. Catholics are going to have to stand up for their own rights and the rights of their children and grandchildren if they expect the church to change. Otherwise, it will not. Most Catholics my age (75) and older were so brainwashed to believe that the priest is next to God and that if we told anyone about what happened to us we would burn in hell. We were carefully coached about bringing scandal on the church, we were kids. We didn’t even know what that meant until ZAM, we’d been raped. And nobody to tell…

  • Suzanne says:

    I have been reading Abuse Tracker’s website daily for over a year. My husband and I left the catholic church in 2002, after the Boston scandal. After reading more and more, we are absolutely appalled. Joelle, why are the police not prosecuting these cases? Bishop Finn’s actions are criminal. Every day more comes out, and each case is beyond logical comprehension. WHY are the police not getting involved here? I don’t understand.

  • Augusta Wynn says:

    William Cardinal Levada, now the most powerful American cardinal in the Vatican, was given the job of overseeing the diocesan review boards after the Dallas Conference in 2002. As archbishop of San Francisco he appointed Rev. Gregory Ingels, a known pedophile, to establish policy for the sex abuse review boards popping up all over the country. Levada admitted under oath that he knew Ingels was a pedophile since 1996 but appointed him anyway, after making Ingels his chief canon lawyer. Ingels was indicted in 2003 and then released because of statute of limitations.

    It is way past time for folks to understand that these bishops really do believe they are above the laws of our nation. Passing pedophiles around, promoting them, conspiring to hide them, it is just business as usual for these men pretending to be followers of Jesus. Having no respect at all for the power of religious ritual, these men of roman catholic hierarchy still perform on altars, while introducing a stunning level of evil into the sacred.

    People who serve on these boards and let bishops continue to obstruct justice are doing the work of darkness.

    Thank you, Joelle, for all that you do.

    AW

  • John Shuster says:

    National Review Board positions are given as plums to faithful Catholics who have served local bishops well. It is all a sham that plays Catholics in the pews for chumps.

  • JeannieGuzman says:

    The reason why bishops aren’t prosecutes are manifold. First of all, there is a mystique or aura of (supposed) “holiness” about them. Secondly, one would assume that men, as educated as bishops usually are, would have the superior intelligence to recognize Mortal Sin, when they see it or hear about it, particularly when it comes to molesting, sodomizing or raping kids or teens. Thirdly, bishops are politically astute, and they hold block of voters, literally in the palms of their hands; no politician in his or her right mind would intentionally butt heads with a bishop. Fourthly, the Church has always had an air of insouciance about Her. Members of the Hierarchy, in any country, could care less about what the public thinks, because they believe they are high on a pedestal above the simple Laity. Fifthly, the bishops have taught their sheep to “Pray, pay and OBEY!” Threats of hell are really real! Somehow, for generations the Hierarchy has hood-winked the Laity into believing that their salvation is in the hands of priests, bishops, archbishops, cardinals, popes, etc………., rather than in the hands of God Almighty! The list is endless, and I, like many others pray for the day when “The Great Angel” of the Book of Revelation will drop “The Great Millstone,” down on the Church “Built on 7 hills.” May God hasten the day!

  • [...] also didn’t inform his own lay review board until six months after Finn learned of the pornography and a month AFTER he finally notified the police. This is a [...]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Copyright © 2010-2014 The Worthy Adversary All rights reserved.
Shades v1.5.1 theme from BuyNowShop.com.