Some thoughts on this week’s Baltimore Bishops’ Meeting

Spoiler warning: The US Conference of Catholic Bishops is taking us for a bunch of rubes.

The bishops are relying upon two things: 1) the public’s lack of institutional memory; and 2) Catholics’ reliance upon the bishop’s artificial moral authority.

#1 Lack of Institutional Memory

Let’s start with #1. The best way to do this is to compare compare scandals: 2002 and 2018.

The 2002 Catholic clergy sex abuse and cover-up scandal was prompted by the Boston Globe Spotlight exposé and subsequent cover-up scandals nationwide. The 2018 meeting is prompted by the Pennsylvania AG report and subsequent AG investigation announcements across the country.

The bishops are in crisis, pure and simple.

Your average 30-year-old reporter was fourteen in 2002. And unless they had a family member who was abused, chances are that the story was nowhere near their radar screen. This is all new to them.

So let’s compare stories.

From Laurie Goodstein’s (who is still on the beat, BTW) June 2002 story on the Dallas meeting in the New York Times:

A day before the nation’s Roman Catholic bishops are to meet in Dallas to debate how to respond to the clergy sexual abuse scandal that has devastated the church, another bishop resigned under the shadow of sexual abuse accusations.

Sound familiar? It gets better. Later in the article:

The meeting in Dallas will deal only with the issue of sexual abuse. As a sign of how grave the crisis is considered to be, the bishops have put off discussion of other issues until their next meeting, in the fall.

Now, from the November 9, 2018, Washington Post:

In a highly unusual move, the bishops will put aside almost everything else on their agenda for the annual meeting of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops next week to focus solely on rectifying their policies on abuse.

Or in this case, not so unusual. It’s what they do when they are in freefall.

Now, let’s look at who complained about the policies. From the 2002 New York Times article:

”The more you nuance, the more hazy it gets, and I think the people are saying, give us a clear standard,” Cardinal McCarrick said. ”As I listen to my brother bishops and as I listen to the people, I think they may feel that one act, even if it happened 30 years ago, should disqualify a man for continuing in the ministry. I’m not there yet.”

And now we know why McCarrick wasn’t “there yet.”

From the 2018 Washington Post Article:

This proposal is likely to provoke the most controversy among the bishops. “I think the whole thing of a code of conduct for the bishops to me is unnecessary. We have a code of conduct — it’s called the Gospel of Jesus Christ. It’s called living a good, holy life,” said Bishop Christopher Coyne of Vermont’s Diocese of Burlington. “This is the life that we’re called to live as bishops. That would be a code of conduct enough.”

After a moment of reflection, Coyne modified his view. “I wish it wasn’t necessary, but it is. Given what has happened in the past and has happened currently, it is.”

Really? No code of conduct for the bishops who have covered up child sexual abuse for decades? It’s not like codes of conduct are foreign to them. Let’s take a look …

Code of Conduct, Diocese of Harrisburg

Code of Conduct, Diocese of Charleston

Code of Conduct, Diocese of Buffalo (ugh)

Code of Conduct, Diocese of Allentown

I could go on, but it would get boring. So I will leave you with the CODES (plural, mind you) for the Diocese of Burlington.

Coyne considers codes of conduct “good for thee, but not for me.” If I were him, I would say, “Lay those rules on me. My burden should be the greatest of all.” His reticence – that “moment of reflection” –  is telling.

#2 Artificial Moral Authority

The bishops will be devoting a full day of the three-day meeting to prayer.

But before it all gets started, the bishops will pray. Their meeting Monday will be chock full of ritual. Mass. Guided prayer and reflection about the grievous effects of sexual abuse. Time for confession.

A full day in prayer and contemplation can be rare for busy bishops, Rogers said. “We’re all very action-oriented people. It’s easy to forget, leading the complex organization of a diocese — all the parishes and schools. This invites them out of the administration of the church, and into why the church is here to begin with.”

They have had plenty of time to pray (sixteen years, in fact, since the 2002 scandal). The bishops have millions of Catholics praying for them.

I don’t recall a single lesson in the New Testament where a wrongdoer, when given a choice between making amends and praying, was told by God, “Hey, I have a great idea. Instead of doing good works for those you have so terribly wronged, why don’t you waste a day and celebrate rituals in secret with your buddies in crime. It’ll be fun.”

What can you do?

Show the bishops you’re not a bunch of rubes. Stop giving. Push back. Join an advocacy group like STOP to change laws and demand accountability. Stand up for those who speak out.

I’ll discuss the bishops’ proposed “schedule” in a later post.

7 thoughts on “Some thoughts on this week’s Baltimore Bishops’ Meeting

  1. “Retired” Bishop James Timlin, Scranton is attending the Baltimore Bishop’s meeting. Remember him? He paid for an abortion when one of his pastors got an underage girl pregnant. Present Scranton Bishop – Bambera asked Timlin not to attend. Timlin was mentioned in the latest PA Grand Jury Report by name. Maybe the ‘good’ bishops attending the meeting will use this occasion to show us how ‘Fraternal Correction’ works? (No, I am not drinking as I write this.)

  2. We must continue to stand together to bring about the necessary change in our Catholic Church. Keep the pressure on World Wide every day to end once and for all, all this ‘evil and weak leadership’ in our Church.

  3. Cardinal William Levada, the archbishop of San Francisco during the Dallas Conference, used his authority for Zero Tolerance, by placing an ADMITTED PEDOPHILE PRIEST in charge of establishing policy for the entire American Church. Levada admitted under oath that he knew Rev. Greg Ingels was an abuser since 1996 but appointed him anyway. Also, made Ingels his Chancellor and Chief Canon Lawyer. That was 2002. Ingels was subsequently indicted.
    Currently, Cardinal Levada holds lectures on recruiting young people back to Church, he who endangered the young all over the globe.
    Some of us are not able to see the latest gathering of bishops as anything other than “an expense of spirit in a waste of shame”. And all in the Name of Holy.
    Thank you, Joelle, for all you do to hold their feet to the fire.

    AW

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *